<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roger Clemens and ERA+</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.owenkellett.info/2005/08/15/roger-clemens-and-era/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.owenkellett.info/2005/08/15/roger-clemens-and-era/</link>
	<description>Technology news, baseball, track and field, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:15:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: owenkellett.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Roger Clemens and Cy (Again)</title>
		<link>http://www.owenkellett.info/2005/08/15/roger-clemens-and-era/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>owenkellett.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Roger Clemens and Cy (Again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.owenkellett.info/2005/08/15/roger-clemens-and-era/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>[...] Even though I don&#8217;t always agree with everything Jayson Stark has to say, I&#8217;d have to say he&#8217;s dead on in this recent column. If you&#8217;ve been paying attention to my site, you might recall that I made a case a while back arguing that Roger Clemens should overwhelmingly win the Cy Young this year. It seems like in this particular domain, Jayson Stark and I are definitely on the same page: And Clemens has made nine starts in which he has given up one earned run or none without getting a win. That&#8217;s as many as Carpenter, Willis, Santana and Colon combined. So if Rodrigo Lopez (with a 4.97 ERA) and Mike Maroth (4.82) have more wins than Roger Clemens, shouldn&#8217;t it be clear to anyone paying attention that &#8220;wins&#8221; might be the most overrated individual stat in baseball? Come on. Admit it already. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even though I don&#8217;t always agree with everything Jayson Stark has to say, I&#8217;d have to say he&#8217;s dead on in this recent column. If you&#8217;ve been paying attention to my site, you might recall that I made a case a while back arguing that Roger Clemens should overwhelmingly win the Cy Young this year. It seems like in this particular domain, Jayson Stark and I are definitely on the same page: And Clemens has made nine starts in which he has given up one earned run or none without getting a win. That&#8217;s as many as Carpenter, Willis, Santana and Colon combined. So if Rodrigo Lopez (with a 4.97 ERA) and Mike Maroth (4.82) have more wins than Roger Clemens, shouldn&#8217;t it be clear to anyone paying attention that &#8220;wins&#8221; might be the most overrated individual stat in baseball? Come on. Admit it already. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owenkellett.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Case Against Closers: Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.owenkellett.info/2005/08/15/roger-clemens-and-era/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>owenkellett.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Case Against Closers: Part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.owenkellett.info/2005/08/15/roger-clemens-and-era/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] As an astute participant in the ever-so-popular game of fantasy baseball, I tend to pay a lot of attention to players&#8217; statistics and how well they correlate to their overall contributions to their teams. In my opinion (and the opinion of many other &#8220;stathead&#8221; baseball fans and analysts), the traditional fantasy categories are not very accurate indicators of a player&#8217;s overall value to his team. I have already alluded to my dissatisfaction with the use of Wins as an important pitcher category in a previous post about Roger Clemens. Today I&#8217;d like to talk about a category that is an even worse metric for a pitcher&#8217;s overall value: the save. Because there are so many arguments that can be presented against using saves as a pitching statistic, I&#8217;m going to present my case in a multi-part series. (Disclaimer: the number of parts in this series is thus far an undetermined amount and could range anywhere from 1 to a lot more than 1) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As an astute participant in the ever-so-popular game of fantasy baseball, I tend to pay a lot of attention to players&#8217; statistics and how well they correlate to their overall contributions to their teams. In my opinion (and the opinion of many other &#8220;stathead&#8221; baseball fans and analysts), the traditional fantasy categories are not very accurate indicators of a player&#8217;s overall value to his team. I have already alluded to my dissatisfaction with the use of Wins as an important pitcher category in a previous post about Roger Clemens. Today I&#8217;d like to talk about a category that is an even worse metric for a pitcher&#8217;s overall value: the save. Because there are so many arguments that can be presented against using saves as a pitching statistic, I&#8217;m going to present my case in a multi-part series. (Disclaimer: the number of parts in this series is thus far an undetermined amount and could range anywhere from 1 to a lot more than 1) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
